What the Autonomous Coding Readiness Assessment Measures
The assessment looks at eight parts of your coding operation that can influence how smoothly autonomous coding fits into your organization:
- Clinical documentation: Variation in note structure, format, and completeness can show how much preparation may be needed before more encounters can move through autonomous coding.
- EHR environment: The number of EHRs and how standardized they are can affect the integration work required to bring a new coding platform into your organization.
- Coding turnaround: Persistent backlogs and DNFB can point to mid-revenue cycle bottlenecks that slow coding and keep encounters from moving forward. They also show where automation may have the greatest operational impact.
- Coder capacity: Open positions, overtime, and outsourcing can signal that your team needs another way to handle volume without simply adding more manual coding capacity.
- Coding and documentation-related denials: These trends help show whether coding and documentation issues are already affecting revenue and need to be addressed as part of an automation strategy.
- Compliance and auditing: Your current audit and QA processes can show whether you already have the oversight needed for autonomous coding or whether you need to put new processes in place.
- AI readiness: How comfortable your team is with AI when deciding how to introduce it. Some organizations may want coders reviewing AI-generated codes first, while others may be comfortable allowing eligible encounters to move through autonomously.
- Rollout foundations: IT resources, executive sponsorship, clean code sets and data, and defined success metrics indicate whether your organization has the support needed to implement and evaluate a rollout.
Taken together, these factors show both your current readiness and the areas that may need attention before you move further with autonomous coding.
How the Autonomous Coding Readiness Assessment Works
You can complete the assessment in about two minutes.
There’s no data gathering or preparation needed beforehand; just answer based on how your coding operation works today:
1. Answer Questions About Your Current Coding Workflow
Work through eight questions based on your current coding environment.
Select the option that best reflects your organization today, including the resources and processes you already have in place.
2. Get Your Readiness Score Across the 8 Factors
The tool evaluates your responses together to calculate an overall readiness score out of 100.
You’ll also receive a readiness profile that puts the score into context for your organization.
3. Review Your Personalized Recommendations
Your results highlight what to focus on next based on your responses.
This could mean preparing certain parts of your operation for automation or exploring where to introduce autonomous coding first.
What Your Autonomous Coding Readiness Result Means
Your score gives you an overall view of how prepared your organization is for autonomous coding.
The ranges are:
| Score Range | What It Signals |
|---|---|
| 75-100: Advanced Readiness | You have a strong foundation for greater coding automation and may be ready to evaluate where autonomous coding can be introduced. |
| 60-74: Strong Readiness | Many of the foundations are in place. AI-assisted coding with human review may be a practical starting point before expanding autonomy. |
| 42-59: Developing Readiness | Some foundations are in place, but you still need to strengthen a few areas before moving further with coding automation. |
| Below 42: Early Stage | You may need more preparation across your coding environment before autonomous coding becomes a practical next step. |
Common Concerns About Autonomous Coding Adoption
Autonomous coding changes how coding work is completed, reviewed, and monitored. However, some teams may be skeptical about adopting an autonomous coding solution.
Here are the four most common concerns:
Can We Trust the Coding Accuracy?
Your team needs a way to evaluate how accurately the technology codes the types of encounters you plan to automate.
Look for a solution that lets you review coding results and measure accuracy before expanding automation. Starting with AI-assisted coding and human review lets coders compare AI-generated codes with their own decisions, identify recurring errors, and improve medical coding accuracy before more encounters move to autonomous coding.
How Much Oversight Will Our Coders Have?
Coding leaders need to know where coders remain involved as more work is automated.
Look for flexibility in how encounters are handled. Some may be appropriate for autonomous coding, while cases that need human judgment should go to coders for review. Your team should also be able to define which encounters require that review.
Will We Be Able to Audit the AI-Generated Codes?
Compliance teams need visibility into how coding decisions were made, not just the final codes.
Look for an audit trail that shows what the AI originally coded, any changes a coder made and why, and subsequent auditor edits. This gives your team a record of what happened throughout the coding process.
What Will Implementation Require From Our Teams?
IT and HIM leaders need to understand what their teams will need to do to bring autonomous coding into the existing workflow.
Consider the integration work involved, the internal resources required, and whether you can introduce the solution in a defined area before a broader rollout. You should also be able to set measures for accuracy, turnaround, and other goals you want to track as automation expands.
How DeliverHealth Supports Your Next Step
DeliverHealth supports coding teams through InstaCode, an autonomous medical coding solution.
With InstaCode, you can choose where AI handles the coding and where your coders stay involved, using AI-assisted, autonomous, human, or hybrid workflows based on the work being coded.
Here’s how our tool can help you:
| Solution Capability | What It Means for You |
|---|---|
| AI-assisted and autonomous coding | Choose how coding is handled based on the encounter and your review requirements. Eligible encounters can be coded autonomously, while others can stay with coders or move through a human-reviewed workflow. |
| Built-in audit system | Review AI-generated codes, coder changes and reasoning, and subsequent auditor edits so your team has visibility into how coding decisions were made. |
| Current coding guidance and payer rules | Give coders access to coding guidance that stays current with code updates and payer rules as they review and complete encounters. |
| PerformPlatform coding workflow | Manage AI-assisted, autonomous, and human coding workflows within PerformPlatform. The clinical documentation is handled separately through DeliverHealth’s documentation platform |
Why Revenue Cycle Leaders Choose DeliverHealth
Bringing AI into coding requires trust in both the technology and the team responsible for it. We have built our solutions around the needs of healthcare organizations and the teams using them every day.
Here are a few reasons organizations work with DeliverHealth:
- 40,000+ healthcare providers: Our technology supports more than 40,000 healthcare providers, giving us experience with documentation and administrative workflows across a large healthcare user base.
- Built specifically for healthcare: We focus on clinical documentation, medical coding, and other administrative workflows that affect the mid-revenue cycle.
- Advanced AI with healthcare context: We use multiple AI models based on the workflow and partner's needs, including Gemini models through our work with Google Cloud.
- Security built into our technology: We maintain healthcare-focused security and privacy practices. Our eSOne platform, which powers InstaNote, is HITRUST certified.
- Used by healthcare organizations in real workflows: Organizations such as DCH Health System use our technology in their clinical documentation operations, showing how our solutions are being used in healthcare environments today.
When you’re ready to discuss what your assessment result means for your coding operation, schedule a demo, and we'll walk you through your options.
Turn Your Readiness Score Into a Coding Roadmap
Once you know where your organization stands, the next question is what to work on first.
Your readiness profile gives you a more specific next step based on the pattern across your answers:
- Hold for Now: Start by improving documentation consistency, establishing a formal audit process, and defining the metrics you will use to measure coding performance. Get these foundations in place before introducing coding automation.
- Foundation First: Get the documentation you want to code with AI into a more consistent shape. Standardize the note formats and workflows that vary today, then look at where AI-assisted coding can be introduced.
- Augmentation Ready: Put AI-assisted coding to work with coders reviewing the output. Start with one service line or a specific group of encounters, and use what your team sees in the results to decide when more of that work can move to autonomous coding.
- Autonomy Ready: Choose the encounters that can move to autonomous coding and set clear rules for what goes back to a coder. Monitor the coding accuracy, exceptions, and audit results as you add more eligible encounters.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Here are a few things to know as you consider the future of your organization:
Is the Autonomous Coding Readiness Assessment Free?
Yes. You don’t have to pay anything to take the assessment.
You just need to provide your email ID to get your results, see where your organization currently stands, and identify areas that may need more attention before you move further with autonomous coding.
How Is My Autonomous Coding Readiness Score Calculated?
We calculate your score based on your responses across the eight areas covered in the assessment.
The result is directional and based on self-reported information, so review it alongside your organization’s coding, compliance, IT, and revenue cycle requirements.
Can We Start with One Specialty or Service Line?
Yes. You can start with one specialty, service line, or group of encounters rather than rolling out autonomous coding everywhere at once.
This gives your team time to see how the workflow performs, review the coding, and decide where to go next.
How Long Does Autonomous Coding Take to Implement?
There isn’t one implementation timeline for every organization. It depends on what you’re starting with, including your EHR setup, coding workflows, integrations, and how much you want to automate.
A smaller rollout will also involve different implementation work than one covering several workflows or locations.
Which EHRs Can Autonomous Coding Integrate With?
InstaCode can integrate with major EHRs, including Epic and athenahealth. The integration allows clinical documentation to flow from the EHR into InstaCode for coding and gives InstaCode access to the EHR as the system of record for validation.
Coding can then be completed in PerformPlatform or directly in the EHR, depending on the workflow.
What Does It Mean If My Organization Is Not Ready Yet?
It means there are specific areas to work on before expanding into autonomous coding. Your assessment results can help identify where to focus first, such as documentation consistency, auditing, governance, or internal resources.
DeliverHealth can review your results with you and help determine an appropriate starting point for your organization.
